San Francisco, CA July 25 and October 5, 2019
SOME REFLECTIONS THE DAY
AFTER
AND THEN SOME LATER
Major takeaways from the
Robert Mueller, Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice,
overseeing the investigation into allegations of Russian
interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and related matters, Congressional testimony on July 24th, 2019:
- Following
the Department of Justice instructions, there were no investigations
related to indictment.
- The investigation did not find
the president innocent of Obstruction of Justice.
- Accepting aid from a foreign
power to gain an advantage in an election is not only unethical, but it is
also a crime.
- Even though a sitting president
cannot be indicted, after leaving office an individual who was previously
president can be indicted.
- The Russians did interfere in the 2016 presidential
elections and they continue their attempts to influence our political
process. This should be a major concern do all Americans, so stated
special counsel Mueller in his testimony. (Note that following shortly
this Congressional testimony, majority leader Mitch McConnell did not even
allow to bring to vote in the Senate a bill proposed to address the
Russian interference problem.)
Also noteworthy:
Following the testimony,
the authors of news items posted on the web appear to have heard two different
versions of the same event. Some, mostly Fox and others aligning on the right,
indicate that in their opinion the testimony was a major failure for the
Democrats, it exonerated the President and nothing new was said. Yet others
tend to align themselves more with the Democrats and the left, emphasizing the
takeaway elements I listed above. While political persuasion may have dominated
some of this perception split, a media component may have had a significant
role too.
According to a news
analysis I saw on the Internet, the Mueller testimony had certainly
similarities to the Nixon-Kennedy debates that took place prior to the 1960
presidential elections. In both cases what people heard depended on the media
through which they received the message. Back in 1960, some listened to the
debate on the radio, while others watched it on television. Those who listened
to the radio felt for sure that Nixon won. They heard Dick Nixon's clear voice that had none of the strong regional accent that so strongly characterized
Jack Kennedy's way of speaking. Those watching television were convinced that
Kennedy was the doubtless winner. They saw the youthful relaxed Kennedy
standing against a sweaty Nixon exhibiting a nervous body language. In
the aftermath of the Mueller Congressional testimony, there also appear to be
two camps of perception. Those who watched the entire 5-hour testimony appear
to have focused on Mueller‘s style that lacked charisma, and on his
unwillingness to answer questions close to 200 times. Those who watched only
the highlights presented on some TV news channels after the debates were over,
or read articles published on the web, tend to consider the testimony a major
historical event and credit the Democrats with significant gains.
And then some notes two-and-a-half months
later:
And then in September, about two-and-a-half months after
the Mueller testimony, we find out that the day after that testimony (the very
same day I wrote the above “takeaways”) Trump was engaged in trying to pressure
a newly elected president of Ukraine to start an investigation against Joe
Biden, Trump’s front running Democrat opponent in the forthcoming 2020
elections. This now triggered an impeachment inquiry in the Democratic Party-controlled House and an impeachment is highly likely to follow. Will the Republican
Party-controlled Senate then find him guilty? Not likely. Though Trump’s
strange behavior gets more bizarre daily (House of Representatives member Adam Schiff should be
tried for treason, Chine should investigate Joe Biden, Mitt Romney should be
impeached, etc...), his base (close to half the country) still has not abandoned him. But
nothing is for sure, things evolve slowly and then happen faster than expected.
No comments:
Post a Comment